πŸ”΄Partners Healthcare

This data contains the price transparency machine-readable files provided by Partners Healthcare that have been normalized into easy-to-use tables.

Payerset Notes

Table of Contents

https://mrf.payerset.com/partners-healthcare

Compliance Scorecard

Overall Rating: N/A (see notes at bottom)

Table of Contents

β˜…β˜†β˜†β˜†β˜†

1/5

  • Are the MRFs kept up to date each month?

  • Is the Table of Contents link easily accessible?

  • Is the Table of Contents properly formatted?

File Accessibility

β˜…β˜†β˜†β˜†β˜†

1/5

  • Are there any barriers to downloading the files?

  • Do the Table of Contents links expire before publishing new links?

Data Quality

β˜…β˜†β˜†β˜†β˜†

1/5

  • What percentage of the MRFs are properly formatted and parseable

    • 5 Stars - 100%

    • 4 Stars - 80%...

Schema: PARTNERS_HEALTHCARE

Rates Records: 1,484,890,123

Provider Records: 1,035,829,671

Additional Observations

Machine-Readable Price Transparency Files Review

  • MRFs Up-to-Date: βœ”οΈ Yes, the MRFs are kept up to date each month, though each region appears to be updated separately and at different times.

  • Table of Contents Accessibility: βœ”οΈ The Table of Contents link is easily accessible.

  • Table of Contents Formatting: ❌ Table of Contents is properly formatted.

  • File Download Barriers: ❌ There are no barriers to downloading the files, though there are mostly zip files that contain thousands of other files, which makes processing a little challenging.

  • File Accessibility Percentage: ❌ 99% of the files are accessible and uncorrupted, there are a few files that are not accessible, and there is one file that is corrupted irreparably (see below). Unfortunately, this results in a lower rating.

Overall Assessment: Partners Healthcare MRFs point to BCBS MA, HP, and Tufts. We are working to understand why this is the case and will update score.

Last updated

Was this helpful?